Midas or the Budgeting curse


Midas or the Budgeting curse


Let’s call him Midas. While he drinks hot coffee and receives a bag of food after waiting for his turn in the long line, he shares a little bit of his story with me.
A long time ago he was a successful jewelery entrepreneur in Gondomar, a business he inherited.
Gold is a commodity highly subject to fluctuations caused by macro factors. 
«I lost everything», regrets Midas.
 

He recognizes that, over the years, he made a number of mistakes regarding his business strategy. He relied too much on the manager responsible for executing the annual budgeting. Midas found out too late that since making accurate estimates was time-consuming, the manager did it fraudulently. Sometimes he underestimated budgeted revenues and other times he overestimated budgeted costs, to achieve targets more easily, creating a budgetary slack. In addition, they were too dependent on the budget, which made them rigid and unable to adapt to changing market circumstances. 


Midas regrets not using the budget as a tool for making managers accountable and monitoring overall results on a regular basis. Asked what he would have done differently, Midas wisely replies that he would try to overcome the traditional budgeting constraints, using rolling budgets created in an ongoing basis. On top of the annual budget he would add a quarterly period to reflect the economic and competitive changes, making the company more agile and adaptable to the environment. Lastly, asked if the "beyond budgeting" philosophy could fit, Midas says he doesn't believe it, because that implied an open collaborative mindset, which still doesn't happen in that industry. Moreover, as it was a kind of manufacturing with inventory, that wouldn’t be an appropriate option.

Midas smiles, gives me a handshake and promises to return the following week.






Comments